Environmental impact, done honestly

Impact numbers you can defend.

CarbonSquare builds credible, fundable environmental impact assessments for climate and circular startups, grounded in real data and never inflated.

Verified factor
Bread production
0.78 kg CO₂e/kg
Source · ADEME Base Empreinte v23.11
✓ cross-checked
Grounded in
ADEME Official LCA databases Peer-reviewed LCA GHG Protocol logic
What we do

Two ways to a number you can defend.

Whether you need the figure built for you, or your startups taught to build their own, the method and the rigor behind it are the same.

For founders

Impact assessment

We build your number for you.

A screening-level avoided-emissions model: sourced, cross-checked, and honest about what it does and doesn't count. The defensible figure you can put in front of investors, partners, and grant bodies.

See it in action →
For accelerators, programmes & communities

Impact workshops

We teach your startups to build their own.

A working session where founders build their own credible impact number, one they can defend to investors, partners and public funders, taught through two real case studies across food and fashion.

Talk about a workshop →
How we work

Three disciplines behind every number.

Most impact figures look fine until someone asks how they were built. Ours are built to answer that question.

01

Sourced emission factors

Every number traces back to an official database or a peer-reviewed study: ADEME, CE Delft, published LCA data. Nothing is a guess we couldn't defend.

02

Counterfactual discipline

We only count a saving when the alternative was real. If the emissions were never going to happen, they don't go in the total, no matter how good they'd look.

03

Cross-checked against literature

Every result is validated against published ranges. If it sits outside the evidence, we revise it, so the number still works when a funder or an auditor asks about it.

What "defensible" looks like ✓ within published range

Our Polpette di Pane result, checked against the published literature range for surplus-food redistribution.

0.59
0.33lit. low 2.0lit. high

kg CO₂e per kg · cross-checked against Casson et al. 2026, Borusiak & Knežević 2024

Case study

A claim, turned into a number that holds.

Polpette di Pane · circular food

Defensible avoided-emissions for a circular food pilot

An Amsterdam circular food startup needed a measurable impact claim it could stand behind, not a number that collapses under due diligence. We built a screening-level model, sourced and cross-checked end to end.

Read the case study →
0.59
kg CO₂e saved per kg of surplus bread · cross-checked & defensible
The Swap Club · circular fashion
What is one swap actually worth?
A defensible per-swap avoided-emissions figure for a clothing-swap platform, built for accelerator and investor readiness.
4.89
kg CO₂e / swap
Read →
Who it's for

Built for people who get asked to prove it.

Founders Claims you can back with data Sustainability messaging grounded in real evidence, never greenwashing.
Accelerators & programmes Credible impact, across your cohort Give the startups in your programme assessments done right the first time.
Impact investors & funds Numbers ready for due diligence Portfolio environmental claims that don't fall apart when someone checks them.
Grant-seekers Fundable environmental data Credible figures for public funds and grant applications that ask for evidence.
Çağla Karslı, founder of CarbonSquare
The person behind the numbers

Çağla Karslı

Environmental scientist and climate-tech builder based in Amsterdam. Two climate startups, a Master's in Environmental Science, and one stubborn question about waste later, CarbonSquare is where my science background and startup experience finally come together.

Read my story →
In their words
Maria Daniela Colagrande
Impact without assessment and real data to share is not impactful as it can be. I knew I needed more strong stance on this while having conversations, then I found CarbonSquare. With real numbers, my startup sparks real interest from investors and clients, because I can finally show what I'm actually achieving.
Maria Daniela Colagrande · Founder, Polpette di Pane
Gökçe Iliklier
Our stakeholders were starting to ask about our environmental impact. Çağla understood how our operations work, she showed me the assumptions behind each logic and we chose to go with the most conservative method. The whole model was finished less than three weeks, not the months a full LCA would take from us. I use our impact number now in investor and partner conversations.
Gökçe Iliklier · Founder, The Swap Club

Let's build a number you can stand behind.

A short call is enough to see whether your impact story can be made defensible, and what it would take.